Burial and Funeral Disputes in NSW: Who Has the Right to Decide?

The Common Law Position: No Property in a Dead Body

A fundamental principle of Australian law is that there is no property in a dead body. A deceased person cannot own their own remains, and family members have no automatic right of ownership over a loved one’s body. This principle was confirmed in Doodeward v Spence (1908) 6 CLR 408 and remains good law in NSW today.

The practical consequence is that a person cannot dictate what happens to their body after death, at least not through a legally enforceable direction. Wishes expressed in a will about burial, cremation, or location are taken into account but are not legally binding on the executor at common law. The executor has discretion.

There is one significant exception, addressed below.

The Executor’s Right to Possession

Where the deceased left a valid will naming an executor who is ready, willing and able to act, that executor has an immediate and exclusive right to possession and custody of the body for the purpose of burial or cremation. This right was articulated clearly by Young J in Smith v Tamworth City Council and has been applied consistently in NSW courts since.

The executor’s right is enforceable. If another person takes possession of the body without the executor’s authority, the executor can seek orders from the Supreme Court to recover it. A person who is not lawfully in possession of the remains cannot claim reimbursement for funeral costs they incur, even if those arrangements were in line with the deceased’s wishes.

The executor is expected to consult with the deceased’s family and other interested parties about funeral arrangements. However, the executor is not legally obligated to follow family preferences. The final decision rests with the executor.

The One Binding Exception: Written Direction Against Cremation

While burial instructions in a will are generally not enforceable, NSW law recognises one binding exception. 

Under the Public Health Act 2010 (NSW) and the Public Health Regulation 2022 (NSW), a person who leaves a written direction that their body is not to be cremated creates a legally binding obligation. A person responsible for organising the funeral must not cremate the body if they are aware of such a direction.

This means that if the deceased left a written statement, in their will or elsewhere, saying their body should not be cremated, that direction must be followed. 

The State Library of NSW’s legal guide to funerals confirms that the executor is not otherwise bound by specific directions left in the will. No equivalent obligation applies to the burial location, the type of funeral service, or other arrangements.

When There Is No Will: Who Decides?

When a person dies intestate, there is no named executor. The right to arrange the burial passes to the person with the highest priority to apply for letters of administration of the estate. 

The order of priority is set out in the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) and the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), and gives rise to the following hierarchy for burial rights.

The priority order under the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) and section 127 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) is as follows:

• Spouse or de facto partner at the time of death (highest priority)
• Children of the deceased
• Parents of the deceased
• Siblings (brothers and sisters) of the deceased
• Grandparents, then aunts and uncles
• Other next of kin in order of proximity
• A person appointed by the Supreme Court if no next of kin can be found

Where two or more people have equal ranking, such as two children of the deceased, the Court applies a practical test: who can arrange the burial without unreasonable delay? Speed and practicality matter because burial or cremation needs to occur promptly.

More: Dying Without a Will in NSW (Dying Intestate)

How the Court Resolves Burial Disputes

The Supreme Court of NSW has inherent jurisdiction to resolve burial disputes, and proceedings are typically urgent given the need for timely arrangements. The approach requires balancing three elements, as confirmed in Darcy v Duckett [2016] NSWSC 1756.

Common Law Principles

The Court applies the priority order above, giving precedence to the executor or, in intestacy, the person with the highest right to administration. Where a surviving spouse or de facto partner exists, their claim generally prevails over children or siblings.

Practical Considerations

The Court considers whether the applicant is in NSW, whether there would be unreasonable delay, and the logistical capacity to carry out the burial.

Cultural, Spiritual and Religious Factors

In Darcy v Duckett [2016] NSWSC 1756, the Supreme Court considered an intestacy dispute between the de facto wife and sister of an Aboriginal man. The sister argued for burial on traditional Weilwan country; the de facto wife sought burial in Bowraville, where the deceased had made his home.

The Court held that the de facto wife had the highest priority at common law and that burial on Gumbaynggirr land was consistent with the deceased’s own choices. The Court directed that the de facto wife involve the deceased’s family’s cultural traditions in the funeral where possible.

Cultural, spiritual, and religious factors receive genuine weight, particularly where the deceased was Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. They sit alongside, rather than override, the common law priority order.

What Happens to Ashes After Cremation?

Where a body is cremated, the person who applied for the cremation is entitled to receive the ashes under the Public Health Regulation 2022 (NSW). However, if a dispute arises over possession of the ashes, the executor has the first right. Where there is no executor, the intestacy priority order applies.

Australian courts have held that ashes can be treated as property because the cremation process involves the lawful exercise of work and skill. The executor or administrator is responsible for decisions about where ashes are placed or scattered. NSW law requires permission from the relevant local council before ashes can be scattered in public spaces, parks, beaches, or waterways.

How to Avoid a Burial Dispute

The most effective way to prevent a funeral dispute is to appoint a reliable executor in a valid will and discuss your funeral and burial wishes with that person and your family in advance.

While instructions in a will are not legally binding, they provide the executor with clear guidance and reduce the risk of conflict. An executor who acts in line with the deceased’s stated wishes is far less likely to face a challenge than one who makes decisions without any documented basis.

The NSW Health guidance on final arrangements of the deceased recommends that people plan ahead, record their wishes, and discuss them with family. Pre-paid funeral plans and written memoranda held with the will are practical tools.

For testators with strong views about burial or cremation, appointing an executor who shares those values is critical. Where family conflict is a risk, specialist estate planning advice, as part of a broader estate plan, can help reduce the likelihood of a dispute.

More: Why Have a Valid and Up-to-date Will?

Areas We Service

Our head office is in Edgecliff in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs, and we assist clients across the Inner West, North Shore, Western Sydney, and Greater Sydney. We act for clients in all Australian states and territories.

Speak With a Wills and Estate Lawyer

Burial and funeral disputes arise at the most difficult time in a family’s life. If you need urgent advice about who has the right to make funeral arrangements, or if you are an executor facing a dispute, call 1300 414 844 today.

Empower Wills and Estate Lawyers offers sliding fee scales, payment plans, pensioner discounts, and no-win, no-fee arrangements in eligible matters. Disbursements and barrister’s fees remain payable regardless of outcome.