How Do You Revoke a Grant of Probate in NSW?
Revocation of a grant of probate in NSW is the process of asking the Supreme Court of NSW to set aside a probate or letters of administration already issued. The grounds include a later valid will, lack of testamentary capacity, fraud, undue influence, or material non-disclosure to the Court.
Revocation undoes a grant that should not have been made; it differs from a probate caveat, which prevents one from being made in the first place. Empower Wills and Estate Lawyers acts for applicants and defenders in revocation matters across NSW. This guide explains the grounds, procedure, and effects.
Need Wills & Estate Help?
- No win no fee*
- Highly reviewed
- Will dispute experts
Revocation vs Caveat: Understanding the Difference
A probate caveat is filed before a grant is made and stops the Registrar from issuing one. Revocation is the remedy after a grant has issued. The two operate at different stages of the same problem.
Once probate has been granted, the executor has legal authority over the estate, and the Supreme Court of NSW’s contested probate procedure confirms that opposed revocation matters are listed in court rather than dealt with by the Registrar in chambers.
Revocation is a serious remedy because it disturbs settled estate administration. Courts require clear evidence of a ground for revocation, particularly when the executor has already begun distributing assets to beneficiaries.
More: How Do You File a Probate Caveat to Stop a Will Grant in NSW?
Grounds for Revocation of Probate in NSW
The Supreme Court of NSW has both statutory power and inherent jurisdiction to revoke a grant. The recognised grounds for revocation include:
- A later valid will is discovered. The most common ground. Where a later will surfaces after probate has been granted on an earlier document, the grant of the earlier will is revoked so the later will can be admitted.
- Lack of testamentary capacity. Evidence that the deceased did not have testamentary capacity at the time of executing the will may emerge only after probate, particularly where medical records take time to obtain.
- Undue influence or fraud. Where the will was procured by undue influence or fraud, the grant based on it can be set aside. These grounds usually require detailed evidence of the surrounding circumstances.
- Improper execution. The will did not meet the formal requirements of Part 2.1 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The grant may have been made on documents that, properly examined, do not satisfy the execution rules.
- Material non-disclosure. The executor failed to disclose facts material to the grant, such as the existence of another potential will or eligible administrator.
- Death or loss of capacity of the personal representative. Where the last surviving executor or administrator dies, or loses capacity, before fully administering the estate, the grant is revoked, and a new grant is issued to a person entitled to administer the unadministered estate.
The Court’s approach to revocation is fact-specific. The strength of the evidence, the lapse of time, and prejudice to beneficiaries already paid are all weighed before an order is made.
How to Apply for Revocation in NSW
Revocation is commenced by court proceedings filed in the Probate and Family Provision List of the Supreme Court of NSW. The procedure differs depending on whether the application is contested.
Standing to Apply
A person with an interest in the estate has standing. That includes a beneficiary under a different will, a person entitled on intestacy, an executor named in another will, or a person entitled to challenge the validity of the will admitted to probate.
Filing the Application
The application is commenced by summons or statement of claim, supported by affidavits setting out the grounds. Detailed evidence is essential because the Court will not lightly disturb an existing grant. The Supreme Court of NSW Probate Checklist sets out the documentary and procedural requirements that practitioners follow.
Deposit of the Grant in the Registry
Under rule 78.49 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970, the Court may order the executor or administrator to deposit the original grant in the registry once revocation proceedings are foreshadowed or commenced. This prevents further reliance on the grant pending the outcome.
Service on Affected Parties
The summons must be served on the executor or administrator holding the grant, all beneficiaries adversely affected by revocation, and any other person with an interest in the estate. Service on parties outside NSW is governed by the usual cross-border service rules.
Hearing
Contested revocation matters proceed in open court. The applicant carries the onus of proof on the ground asserted. The judge gives written reasons and, if revocation is ordered, deals with consequential matters, including a new grant and costs.
What Happens to the Estate During Revocation Proceedings
Revocation proceedings can take months. The Court has tools to manage the estate between commencement and final decision:
- Administration pendente lite. Under section 73 of the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), the Court can appoint an administrator to manage the estate pending the litigation. This grant is limited to safeguarding the estate, not distributing it.
- Independent administrator. Where the executor is a party or conflicted, the Court typically appoints an independent solicitor or trustee company as administrator pendente lite. This protects all parties.
- Restraint on dealings. The Court can order that no distributions be made and that estate assets not be dealt with except as the Court directs.
- Interim accounts. The personal representative may be required to file accounts so that beneficiaries and the Court can monitor the estate during the proceedings.
- Effect on resealing. Where the original grant is challenged, the Registrar will not reseal it for use in other jurisdictions while revocation is pending.
More: Can I Challenge or Contest a Will After Probate?
The Effect of Revocation Under Section 40D
The effect of revocation is set out in section 40D of the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW). The provision protects acts done in good faith under the original grant while reopening the underlying question of who is entitled to administer the estate.
Acts Done in Good Faith Remain Valid
A payment, conveyance, or other act done in good faith by the personal representative under the revoked grant before its revocation is generally protected. Third parties who dealt with the executor in good faith are not exposed to liability simply because the grant was later set aside.
Estate Distributions Already Made
Where the executor has paid out estate funds to beneficiaries under the revoked grant, section 40D(3) expressly preserves the right of any person to follow assets into the hands of those among whom they were distributed. The Court can make consequential orders requiring restitution where the recipient was not entitled under the true will, though recovery from innocent third parties may be incomplete.
A New Grant Is Made
The Court typically orders that a new grant of probate or letters of administration issue to the person now entitled, whether under a later will, on intestacy, or otherwise. The new grant takes effect from its date, and the Letters of Administration practice page sets out the process the Registrar follows.
Future Administration Continues Under the New Grant
The new personal representative steps into the role and continues the administration. Outstanding debts, tax obligations, and family provision claims continue against the estate under the new grant.
Costs Considerations in Revocation Proceedings
Revocation proceedings can be expensive. The costs rules reflect that revocation can be brought reasonably even where it ultimately fails:
- Costs follow the event. The general rule is that the unsuccessful party pays the successful party’s costs, although the Court has wide discretion in probate matters.
- Costs of the estate. Where the proceedings have been brought reasonably and primarily for the benefit of the estate, the Court may order that the costs of one or more parties be paid out of the estate.
- Adverse costs orders. Where revocation is brought without proper grounds or pursued unreasonably, the unsuccessful party may be ordered to pay costs personally rather than out of the estate.
- Calderbank and offers of compromise. Written settlement offers can shift costs and liability where a party rejects a reasonable offer and does worse at the hearing.
- Engagement of experienced counsel. Revocation matters typically involve barristers and senior solicitors. Cost estimates should be obtained early and reviewed as the matter develops.
Speak to a Revocation of Probate Lawyer
If you have discovered a later will, evidence of incapacity, or grounds to suspect the will admitted to probate is not valid, call Empower Wills and Estate Lawyers on 1300 414 844. Our specialist practice acts for applicants and defenders in revocation and contested probate matters across NSW. Revocation proceedings are evidence-intensive and rarely brief, and our fee discussion at first consultation covers payment plans, sliding scales, pensioner discounts, and no-win, no-fee agreements where eligible. Disbursements and barrister’s fees apply regardless of outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long after probate is granted can revocation be sought?
There is no fixed statutory time limit, but delay weakens a revocation application. The longer the estate has been administered and the more distributions made, the harder it is to obtain revocation and to recover assets.
Can revocation be granted by consent?
Yes. Where all interested parties consent, and the evidence supports the order, the Court can make a consent revocation order. Consent does not remove the Court’s duty to be satisfied that revocation is appropriate.
What happens if the estate has already been fully distributed?
Revocation can still be sought, but the practical remedy is limited. The Court can make orders for tracing and restitution, but recovery from third parties or innocent beneficiaries may be incomplete.
Is revocation the same as challenging a will?
No. A will challenge the document’s validity. Revocation targets the grant of probate based on that document. The two often run in tandem because revocation usually requires the underlying will to be set aside.
Can the executor oppose revocation?
Yes. The executor named in the revoked will is typically the defendant. The executor may put on evidence supporting the original grant and resisting revocation, with the costs of doing so usually drawn from the estate where the defence is reasonable.
Will a new grant be made automatically after revocation?
Not automatically. The Court will usually direct that a new application for probate or letters of administration be made by the person now entitled. The new grant proceeds through the usual Probate Registry process.